“The Partition Street Project” has inspired me to consider Mother Theresa and the words that she lived her life by … “We can do no great things; we can only do small things with great love.”
The owners of this project are land developers, savvy business men, and a United States Congressman who have garnered the support of our Mayor, our Economic Development Team, as well as our Business community (business owners have been “highly encouraged” by the Chamber of Commerce to support this development). (This “local support” does not take into account the project’s lawyers, tax consultants, and investors, who no doubt have their affiliations as well). With the “support” this project has gathered, rest assured, the investors will be able to create what they consider “a great thing”.
A group of concerned citizens have come up against the development plans, as well as the influence of our elected officials, in the attempts of “doing small things with great love.” I only wish that I still believed in this Village, and its leaders, to believe that they will enforce the law to get the best results for the Village. Unfortunately I don’t. I hope that I am proven wrong.
From what I have read, observed, and listened to, I don’t believe “The Partition Street Project” has the ability, nor the concern, to “do small things with great love.” Small things with great love ensure that our neighbor’s house won’t be rocked off its foundation from blasting; their view of a pristine environment won’t be blocked by a parking lot or brick wall; that a community which is identified by its landscape won’t be alienated from its source; that the “bottom line” is not what we have gained, but what we have given.
The catch phrase that I hear most often regarding this development is “economic development” and how “this project is good for business.” This publicity, generated by the developers and their support team, is backed by its previous development, HITS. (I’m still unclear on what HITS has actually done for our community, and whose economic development was ensured)? Perhaps I’m the only one who observes how many stores and business in Saugerties have failed and closed? How many properties remain vacant? How many people can’t pay their taxes? Remind me again of “the economic development” and how much these developments have helped our community?
I have personally come to know that our richness here in Saugerties is in our natural resources. It is not the Town or Village or our development projects that makes us great, it is the abundance of the natural world, that we have been blessed to live within, that make us rich. Without question, these lands and our resources are rapidly diminishing as “development projects” take over. And so I ask, “Do you honestly believe that someone from New York City, or a tourist from afar, is actually going to come to Saugerties to view a parking lot”? No, they will come because of our waterfalls, our creeks and river, birds migrating, our bike paths and walking paths, our accessibility to the natural world. They will come because our Village and Town wrap itself around our natural resources, resources that no people, no town, and no development can own. We can only be the stewards of our natural resources; how we steward a land will become our legacy. Long after we have passed, our “developments” will remain. Will your children and grandchildren be proud of what you have developed, what you have valued, how you have treated your neighbors, and what you have left behind? This remains to be seen.
I have witnessed that most people in our community do not care about their neighbors, or our shared natural resources; they choose not to be involved when our resources are violated, and behave as though “it’s not their problem”. Their choice is to be complacent, and become involved in what personally benefits them. I can assure those people, by the time you have moved from your complacency, it will be too late.
With all due respect, most citizens of Saugerties have become “the cow following the cow who wears the bell.” As we are a rural farming community, or once were, our “developers” and “Town officials” now have the privilege, and the power, of being “the cow who wears the bell.” Where will you lead your people and how will you protect our shared resources? Will it be to your perception of “great things” or will it be to “small things done with great love”?
Your legacy, and ours, remains to be seen; it will be the ultimate mark of what we stood for, the values we admire and represent, and the values we teach our children.
I believe Daphne Rose Kingman states this perspective best: “In the end, nothing we do or say in this life time will matter as much as the way we have loved one another.”
Elise Muller / Saugerties
www.mountain-spirit-botanicals.com
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
December 22, 2009
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
Dear Editor:
I am trying to understand the role of the public in the development process, as I have been following the Partition Street Project. Everyone says don’t worry everything will be fine and we should rely on the reputation of the developers. I am diligently positive about the project, as I think it will be good for Saugerties, but I do want the applicants to follow the law.
The New York State law requires a review and in the case of a project of this size and complexity, it requires a full review of all environmental impacts. I know that the developers have hired professional consultants to help them in the review process, but they are trying to avoid the full review which would allow the public to participate in the consideration of alternatives. Now what we are told is that this sketch plan is the only plan and there can be no changes.
We have tried to meet with the developer. We have tried to meet with our Congressman who in this case is also an investor in the project. We have tried to get on the agenda of the Village Planning Board, but have been told we cannot be on their agenda unless we have an application for a project. It appears to me that this is a shut out. We can attend Village Planning Board meetings, but we cannot speak. We can attend, but we cannot get on the agenda. Yes, they held one Public Hearing, but that is inadequate for what we want to accomplish. We want to sit with the applicants to share our ideas that we believe will make a better project.
This process of public participation has worked in many other towns and villages in our area. We call on the Village Planning Board to not be intimidated or to buy into the ruse that the developer will walk away if they require him to follow the law and go through a full environmental review. He will not walk away and we will all benefit from a better project.
What it takes is for the Village Planning Board to recognize their role which is not to immediately acquiesce to the developer’s wishes, but to work to shape the future of the Village in the public interest.
Yours truly,
Saugerties Citizens for Smart Development
Judith Spektor
311 Van Vlierden Road, Saugerties
judithspektor@aol.com